The Cheater’s High is a study published by the American Psychological Association, which concluded that cheating could paradoxically trigger positive feelings among those who participated in the act. They found that participants who cheated had more positive feelings than those who did not. In an experiment involving math and logic questions, cheaters were overall more satisfied than those who followed the rules or had the chance to break the rules. As long as no one was hurt they did not feel guilty but rather, noted a boost from getting away with it.
Another study looking at why students cheat concluded that after cheating once, students did not view it as immoral the second time. The research also found that if a student sensed others were using deceptive means during testing, their chances of doing the same increased as well. This is similar to when an athlete will sometimes rationalize their unethical behavior on the basis that their opponents were doing the same.
Cheating terms in sports:
- Corking – When a baseball player inserts cork into the interior of a baseball bat, to make it lighter. A lighter bat allows a hitter to catch up to pitches.
- Match fixing – When players, coaches, team officials or referees manipulate the results of a match, usually to help out gamblers.
- Falsified birth certificate - Athletes falsify their birth certificate in order to appear younger or older in order to be eligible to participate in certain sporting events.
References Available from SIRC Online Collection:
1. Broshuis G. Restoring Integrity to America's Pastime: Moving towards a More Normative Approach to Cheating in Baseball. Texas Review Of Entertainment & Sports Law. Spring2013 2013;14(2):119-146.
2. PALOU P, JAVIER PONSETI F, GARCIA-MAS A, et al. ACCEPTANCE OF GAMESMANSHIP AND CHEATING IN YOUNG COMPETITIVE ATHLETES IN RELATION TO THE MOTIVATIONAL CLIMATE GENERATED BY PARENTS AND COACHES1,2. Perceptual & Motor Skills . August 2013;117(1):290-303.
3. POTGIETER J. CHEATING: THE DARK SIDE OF SPORT. South African Journal For Research In Sport, Physical Education & Recreation (SAJR SPER). October 2013;35(2):153-162.
4. Ribock J. THE NCAA: ENABLING CHEATING SINCE 1910 BY INADEQUATELY PUNISHING CHEATING COACHES. Mississippi Sports Law Review. Spring2012 2012;2(1):389-409.
5. Šukys S. ATHLETES' JUSTIFICATION OF CHEATING IN SPORT: RELATIONSHIP WITH MORAL DISENGAGEMENT IN SPORT AND PERSONAL FACTORS. / MORALINIO PATEISINIMO IR SPORTININKŲ ASMENINIŲ VEIKSNIŲ SĄSAJOS SU APGAULĖS SPORTINĖJE VEIKLOJE VERTINIMU. Education. Physical Training. Sport. November 2013;3(90):70-77.
6. Zaksaite S. The Interrelation of Micro and Macro Factors That Contribute to Cheating in Sports. Sport & EU Review. October 2012;4(2):9-23.